New Generations and Employment – An Exploratory Study about Tensions Between the Psycho-social Characteristics of the Generation Z and Expectations and Actions of Organizational Structures Related with Employment (CABA, 2016).
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18533/job.v2i1.53Keywords:
Employment, expectations, Generation Z, organizations, organizational culture, psycho-social characteristicsAbstract
Generational studies have an important research tradition in social and human sciences.
On the one hand, the speed of social change in the context of globalization imposes the need to research the transformations are identified both the subjectivity of the agents involved and its inclusion in the institutional matrix, specifically employment. Generation Z, (generally considered as the population group whose birth occurs after 1995) have unique psycho-social characteristics. Gen Z is characterized by a different set of values, beliefs, attitudes and ambitions that impact in their concrete action in organizational structures.
On the other hand, managers often have to deal with generational differences in the workplace. Organizations have members who belong to different generations; they had never before faced the challenge of having such a diverse group of members. The members of each historical generation are characterized by a different set of values, beliefs, attitudes and ambitions that are manifest in their concrete action in organizational structures.
Gen Z it’s the only one who can fully be considered "global", while its members were born in the consolidated context of globalization. Some salient features of the Generation Z can be summarized as follows. They’re the first fully born into a digital world. Social networks and technology are integrated into their lives. They are concerned about the challenges of the modern world (poverty, inequality, climate change, among others). They are self-expressive, more liberal and open to change. They often bore easily, with short attention spans. They do not like routine tasks. They want to achieve a good life-work balance and they are interested in a flexible work environment, as opposed to traditional work schedule. They are critical thinkers, who come with innovative and creative ideas to help.
Research design considered methodological triangulation. Data was collected with two techniques: a self-administered survey with multiple choice questions and attitudinal scales applied over a non-probabilistic sample by reasoned decision. According to the multi-method strategy, also it was conducted in-depth interviews.
Organizations constantly face new challenges. One of the biggest ones is to learn to manage a multi-generational scope of work. While Gen Z has not yet been fully incorporated (expected to do so in five years or so), many organizations have already begun to implement a series of changes in its recruitment and development. The main obstacle to retaining young talent is the gap between the expectations of iGen applicants and what companies offer. Members of the iGen expect not only a good salary and job stability, but also a clear career plan. Generation Z needs to have immediate feedback of their tasks. However, many organizations have yet to improve both motivation and monitoring practices. It is essential for companies to take a review of organizational practices anchored in the culture of the organization.Â
References
Addor, M. L. (2011) Generation Z: What is the Future of Stakeholder Engagement? Institute for EMERGING ISSUES – NC State University, pp. 1- 7. Documento electrónico en lÃnea, disponible en https://iei.ncsu.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2013/01/GenZStakeholders2.pdf. Fecha de acceso: 23-09-2016.
Adecco (2015) Generation Z vs. Millennials. Documento electrónico en lÃnea: disponible en http://pages.adeccousa.com/rs/107-IXF 39/images/generation-z-vs-millennials.pdf, fecha de acceso: 15-09-2016.
Bennett, J., Pitt, M., Price, S. (2012). Understanding the impact of generational issues in the workplace. Facilities, Vol. 30 (Iss. 7/8), pp. 278-288.
Castellano, S. (2016) Welcome Generation Z to work. Talent Development, February 2016, pp. 18.
Cherrington, Ruth (1997) Generational Issues in China: A Case Study of the 1980s Generation of Young Intellectuals, en The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 48, No. 2 (Jun., 1997), pp. 302-320.
Fister Gale, S. (2015) Forget Millenials: Are you ready for Generation Z? Chief Learning Officer. Documento electrónico en lÃnea, disponible en www.CLOmedia.com, fecha de acceso: 23-08-2016.
Half, R. (2015) Get ready for generation Z. Documento electrónico en lÃnea, disponible en: https: //www.roberthalf.com/sites/default/files/Media_Root/images/rhpdfs/rh_0715_wp_genz_nam_eng_sec.pf, Fecha de acceso: 22-09-2016.
Iorgulescu, M. C. (2016) Generation Z and its perception of work. Cross-Cultural Management Journal. Volume XVIII, Issue 1 (9).
Maioli, E. et al (2014) Generación Z, Educación y Empleo. Una revisión de elementos conceptuales para el estudio de los impactos
generacionales en el ámbito institucional de la educación y el empleo en Argentina (2013). Ponencia presentada en XX Jornadas de Investigación y IX Encuentro de Investigadores en PsicologÃa del MERCOSUR, Buenos Aires, 2014.
Pilcher, J. (1994). Mannheim’s sociology of generations: an undervalued legacy. BJS, Vol. 45, No. 3, (September 1994), pp. 481-495.
Rojasa, G. M. y Siga, L. (2009). On the nature of micro-entrepeneurship: evidence from Argentina. Applied Economics, 41 (21), 2667-2680.
Rúa, M. (2014) Yo, entrepreneur. Documento electrónico en lÃnea, disponible en: http://www.lanacion.com.ar/1671916-yo-entrepreneur.Fecha de acceso: 11-09-2016.
Smola, Karen Wey and Sutton, Charlotte D. (2002) Generational Differences: Revisiting Generational Work Values for the New Millennium en Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 23, No. 4, Special Issue: Brave New Workplace: Organizational Behavior in the Electronic Age (Jun., 2002), pp. 363-382.
Stuckey, C. (2016) Preparing leaders for Gen Z. Training Journal. Documento electrónico en lÃnea, disponible en: www.trainingjournal.com. Fecha de acceso: 03-08-2016.
Tulgan, B. (2013). Meet Generation Z: The second generation within the giant “Millennial†cohort. RainmakerThinking. Documento electrónico en lÃnea, disponible en: http://rainmakerthinking.com/assets/uploads/2013/10/Gen-Z-hitepaper.pdf. Fecha de acceso: 03-08-2016.
Wiedmer, T. (2016). Generations do differ: best practices in leading Traditionalists, Boomers, and Generations X, Y, and Z. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin: International Journal for Professional Educators (September 2016), pp. 51-58.
Wood, S. (2013). Generation Z as Consumers: Trends and Innovation. Institute for EMERGING ISSUES: NC State University, pp., 1-3. Documento electrónico en lÃnea, disponible en: https: //iei.ncsu.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2013/01/GenZConsumers.pdf, Fecha de acceso: 03-08-2016.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).