Understanding the Many Factors that Affect the Success of Organizational Work Teams

Authors

  • Robert J. Trent Lehigh University Professor of Management 621 Taylor Street Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA 610-758-4952

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18533/job.v1i6.40

Keywords:

Teams, Team leadership, Team size, Qualitative analysis, Critical success factors

Abstract

After years of experience and research, one might conclude that organizations are confident in their ability to optimize the use of teams.  In reality, we do not have to look far to find instances where team performance falls disappointingly short.  This article examines the reasons for the success or failure of three organizational work teams.  Using information gained from structured interviews involving team members, team leaders, and managers, a set of value-added findings are reached that explain why a particular team was or was not successful. 

 This paper also presents original quantitative research that examined a variety of factors that affect work team success.  It presents insights into a set of important factors that can affect team performance, particularly new findings regarding team size as well as the kind of organizational team model employed.  The article concludes with a set of recommendationsand policy implications derived from the research.  

References

Cherry, K., “What is Social Loafing?†http://psychology.about.com/od/sindex/g/socialloafing.htm, retrieved October 2015.

Coutu D. (2009). Why teams don’t work. Harvard Business Review, 87(5): 98-105.

Guzzo, R.A. (1986). Group decision making and group effectiveness,†in Designing Effective Work Groups, editor P.S. Goodman. Jossey-Bass Publishers: San Francisco, CA.

Hackman, J.R. (1990). Groups that Work—Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork, Jossey-Bass Publishers: San Francisco, CA.

Hillman, L.W., Schwandt, D.R., Bartz, D.E. (1990). Enhancing staff members′ performance through feedback and coaching. Journal of Management Development, 9(3): 20–27.

Kozlowski, S.W.J. and Bell, B.S. (2001). Work Groups and Teams in Organizations, Cornell University ILR School: Cornell, NY, retrieved from http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1396&context=articles, 47, 55.

Likert, R. (1961). New Patterns of Management. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 162.

Manuel London (2008). Job Feedback: Giving, Seeking, and Using Feedback for Performance Improvement. Taylor and Francis: Great Britain.

Peters, L.H. and O’Connors, E.J. (1980). Situational constraints and work outcomes: the influences of a frequently overlooked construct. Academy of Management Review, 5(3): 391-397.

Stogdill, R.M. (1981). Leaders and their immediate groups. Handbook of Leadership. Free Press, New York, NY, chapter 24.

Takeuchi, H. Nonaka, I., (1986). The new new product development game. Harvard Business Review, 64(1): 137.

Trent, R.J., (2004). “Team leadership at the 100-foot level,†Team Performance Management, Vol. 10 No. 5/6, pp. 95-100.

Wicker, A.W., Kirmeyer, S.L., Hanson, L., and Alexander, D. (1976). Effects of manning levels on subjective experiences, performance, and verbal interaction in groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 17(2): 251-274.

Zenger, J., Musselwhite, E., Hurson, K. and Perrin, C. (1994). Leading Teams: Mastering the New Role. Homewood, IL: Irwin: 14-15.

Downloads

Published

2016-07-08

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 3 (2016): July

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).